Search found 14 matches
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:24 pm
- Forum: REPAIRS and MODIFICATIONS
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Ski Bar
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6824
Re: Ski Bar for 1973 Outrage 21
Thanks, Russell! I checked it out. Looks like a good option -- pricey, but looks easy to install and the reviews are good.
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 1:19 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Update: The dealer recommended XD50, so that's what I've been running.
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 1:11 pm
- Forum: REPAIRS and MODIFICATIONS
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Ski Bar
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6824
1973 Outrage 21 Ski Bar
Now that I have finished the re-power with an Evinrude 150 H.O. and Rebel stainless propeller, and [the 1973 Boston Whaler OUTRAGE 21 boat] runs great--50-MPH--it's time to come up with a better system for pulling the kids on a tube. Currently, I'm running a cable between the two transom towing eyes...
- Wed May 18, 2016 6:54 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Looks like I'm going with the Evinrude E-TEC 150 H.O. in graphite (black)! I chose the E-TEC 150 H.O. over a Suzuki DF200, which would have only been about $700 more, out-the-door--not too much real-world power difference and 80-lbs more weight on the transom. Is there an XD-100 setting on the 150 H...
- Sat May 14, 2016 12:43 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
grizzly wrote:I installed a F150 on my 2986 Outrage and thought it was too big and out of proportion to the boat.
What model year was the F150?
- Fri May 13, 2016 6:42 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Thanks, Phil. That's just what I wanted to hear.
- Fri May 13, 2016 12:50 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
A used-engine dealer tried to sell me on using a jack plate and going with 25-inch-shart engine rather than 20-inch-shaft engine. I am going to research jack plates, but don't know much about them. My first thought is that I would worry that this would put extra stress on the transom. Other than tha...
- Fri May 13, 2016 11:08 am
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Suzuki engines have good reputation in the Lower Alabama coastal area and I've seen them on several commercial guide boats. My only concern would be a good local dealer for service and parts. Funny, you should mention that, Butch. One of the factors that is in the calculus is the fact that despite ...
- Thu May 12, 2016 11:00 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Maverick wrote:I've read favorable posts about Suzuki but never owned one. Is there a big difference in dollars and specifications?
The 200 Zuke weighs in at 498 and is essentially the same price installed/out-the-door as the 150 HO. The 200 Verado is 510 lbs and approx. $700 more.
- Thu May 12, 2016 6:31 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
New horse in the running -- Suzuki DF200A (498 lbs) -- with incentives, it is even less expensive than the etec 150HO!!
- Thu May 12, 2016 4:03 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Thanks, Russell and Mav. Mav, although my hull is 3' longer than yours, it weighs in at 1600 lbs vs. your 1800 so that is a good sign for the 150HO. I think that with all of the considerations, including price, I've narrowed it down to an Etec 150 HO, or a Mercury Verado 200. I can't find reliable i...
- Thu May 12, 2016 3:40 pm
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Thanks for the advice! I think that with all of the considerations, including price, I've narrowed it down to an Etec 150 HO, or a Mercury Verado 200. I can't find reliable info on how much our original twin Johnson 65's weight -- (420-460). The etec only weighs 420 (plus the oil tank -- 40-60 lbs f...
- Wed May 11, 2016 11:00 am
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
Re: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
Thanks, Butch. I looked at the Verado 175, but was a bit put off because of the weight (and there is a 6 week wait for one here).
Looks like I posted this in the wrong category. Oops!
Looks like I posted this in the wrong category. Oops!
- Wed May 11, 2016 1:41 am
- Forum: PERFORMANCE
- Topic: 1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
- Replies: 25
- Views: 18991
1973 Outrage 21 Re-power
[Multiple threads on this same topic have been merged into one thread.--jimh] [I am] re-powering a Boston Whaler Outrage 21 that has been in the family (and garaged) since new. If you can believe it, she still has the original twin Johnson 65-HP engines with top-end and carburetors rebuilt less than...