I don’t understand the qualification for the Moeller 24-gallon tank as being “fairly easy to fill.”
Please explain the variation in difficulty in filling an on-deck fuel tank. I don’t anticipate that a particularly brand or a particular capacity tank will be easier or harder to fill than another. Also, what is stopping the 24-gallon Moeller tank from being considered “easy” to fill and requires the qualification “fairly” to moderate the ease of filling?
I am also confused about modification to the cockpit deck. All on-deck fuel tanks just sit on the deck.
From what I see, the features of an on-deck fuel tank that are advantageous for a MONTAUK 17 boat are:
—its height and width allow it to fit under a reversible pilot seat (RPS);
—the fuel fill inlet is arranged to be accessible while the tank is in place under the RPS;
—the tank is molded in a white polyethylene and is aesthetically more harmonious than a red tank.
On a MONTAUK 17 the fuel supply hose usually runs to the engine from the on-deck fuel tank by going under the deck through the rigging tunnel. An access hole is usually provided under the RPS for the fuel line to reach the rigging tunnel. A further advantage of an on-deck fuel tank for a MONTAUK 17 boat will be for an existing access hole to not be covered by the tank.
At some time in the recent past Moeller was making a 22-gallon on-deck fuel tank available in white that met those criteria.
There a good discussion about a particular Moeller tank at
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/018886.htmlThere seems to be some variation in the specified capacity of the tank. I think is has been mentioned as a 22-gallon and a 24-gallon tank.